Cursed (two syllables) email
Have you ever stopped to think about the hefty price we pay for having an email address? I'm not talking about having to sort through the messages relating to Nigerian banking scams or Tijuana-based erectile dysfunction drug companies. Those are certainly a pain to have to weed through, but in my book those annoyances don't measure up to the accountability we are subjected to by electronic mail.
In the past I've had a few potential employers and organizations ask me for my email address only to follow up with the question How often do you check your email? Because I want the position (whatever it is at the time) I always say that i check my email daily, which is usually true, but in doing so I obligate myself, at least to some degree, of being on call 24 hours a day. In other words, it opens up the door for an employer to email me and expect an answer regardless of whether I'm scheduled to appear at work that day.
This is not so much a gripe as it is an observation.
This brings to mind the people who call up and upon getting an answering machine say I know you're there so pick up the phone.
How dare they?
When I was single I would constantly change the message on my answering machine. Once when I was fed up with aforementioned types my message said:
That message got mixed reviews. Some friends took it as a personal attack which was not my intention. I just couldn't believe the audacity of those who would assume that because they wanted me to answer my phone I should drop whatever i was doing and do their bidding.
Would these same people invite themselves into your living room and ask you to make them a sandwich? Can't you just hear them say Don't forget to cut the crusts off! They probably wouldn't be so bold, but in essence that's basically what they're doing when they make demands of you via the telephone.
Going back to the job application, what if instead of asking how often you check your email, it asked how often you were willing to work for free outside of your scheduled hours? After all, isn't this really what the question is asking when you get right down to it? Otherwise, why wouldn't the sender just wait until you clocked in to ask you whatever they needed?
As cantankerous as I may seem at times, I am not into complaining about things that are within my control. I used to work at a job where coworkers would complain about how little they made, yet they would continue to show up for work every day.
Talk is cheap.
My argument was that we set our own worth every day that we clocked in. Regardless of how "poorly" the employer was rewarding us, we told that employer we were okay with that every day that we showed up for work.
The same is true for responding to someone's email. If I respond during my personal time, I'm telling the sender I am willing to file them into the same category as I do my family and friends. I'm saying I'm just as anxious to receive their news as I am my niece's prom pictures or my friend's latest gossip or my wife's cherished sweet nothings.
If this isn't the case, I have only myself to blame.
I am curious to hear how others have dealt with this dilemma.
In the past I've had a few potential employers and organizations ask me for my email address only to follow up with the question How often do you check your email? Because I want the position (whatever it is at the time) I always say that i check my email daily, which is usually true, but in doing so I obligate myself, at least to some degree, of being on call 24 hours a day. In other words, it opens up the door for an employer to email me and expect an answer regardless of whether I'm scheduled to appear at work that day.
This is not so much a gripe as it is an observation.
This brings to mind the people who call up and upon getting an answering machine say I know you're there so pick up the phone.
How dare they?
When I was single I would constantly change the message on my answering machine. Once when I was fed up with aforementioned types my message said:
Please leave a message after the beep. Do understand
however that leaving a message does not obligate me to call you back. Also
if I am screening my calls, announcing who you are does not obligate me to pick
up the phone. My phone does not control me; I control my phone.
Would these same people invite themselves into your living room and ask you to make them a sandwich? Can't you just hear them say Don't forget to cut the crusts off! They probably wouldn't be so bold, but in essence that's basically what they're doing when they make demands of you via the telephone.
Going back to the job application, what if instead of asking how often you check your email, it asked how often you were willing to work for free outside of your scheduled hours? After all, isn't this really what the question is asking when you get right down to it? Otherwise, why wouldn't the sender just wait until you clocked in to ask you whatever they needed?
As cantankerous as I may seem at times, I am not into complaining about things that are within my control. I used to work at a job where coworkers would complain about how little they made, yet they would continue to show up for work every day.
Talk is cheap.
My argument was that we set our own worth every day that we clocked in. Regardless of how "poorly" the employer was rewarding us, we told that employer we were okay with that every day that we showed up for work.
The same is true for responding to someone's email. If I respond during my personal time, I'm telling the sender I am willing to file them into the same category as I do my family and friends. I'm saying I'm just as anxious to receive their news as I am my niece's prom pictures or my friend's latest gossip or my wife's cherished sweet nothings.
If this isn't the case, I have only myself to blame.
I am curious to hear how others have dealt with this dilemma.
posted by kevin black at
12:25 PM
4 Comments:
Remember when only doctors had beepers because they dealt with life and death situations?
Glad that teachers have risen to the ranks of captain of industry now. They totally deserve the boost!
It seems to me that as long as you respond to that single e-mail to get the job, you wouldn't need to respond to future ones. Good thing my workplace hasn't figured this one out, because if they did we'd never have problems with people not showing up or not having anyone to call.
Of course you could always tell them your internet service is only available Monday through Friday 8-5. ;)
I've never worked for an employer who emailed me on my own personal email. I don't really feel that my own personal email is any of their business. I don't think I would work for an organization that expected me to be on call in that manner. If my work did email me on my personal email I would probably not open it until I got to work. When asked why I was checking my personal email at work I would explain to them that if they did not want me to check my personal email at work then they shouldn't email me work related items to my personal email.
For me, I rarely answer the phone but I do answer emails. Emails to me are like phone calls where they've left a message. I can call or email back on my time, in my terms. And with email it's easier to end the conversation than on a phone call.
One thing that ALWAYS cracks me up? When people submit their personal emails on a professional application or resume... SexyKitten69@aol.com? ON A FREAKIN' RESUME? Oy.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home